If you think you can simply bring employees back to the office and move on, think again. A rigid, inflexible approach will backfire. The pandemic proved that many employees can be just as, if not more, productive when working remotely. If leaders ignore this hard-earned lesson and revert to pre-pandemic models, they will pay the price in disengaged employees and high turnover rates.
Emphasizing flexibility and keeping the door open for future adjustments is key. Employees need to know that this decision isn’t a death sentence for remote work or flexibility. By framing the return-to-office decision as a dynamic, evolving strategy, you can mitigate some of the resistance and keep employees engaged.
Leaders who lock employees into rigid, full-time office mandates will find themselves hemorrhaging talent, particularly among high performers who have grown accustomed to the autonomy of remote work. Flexibility isn’t a luxury; it’s the future of work. If you can’t embrace that, your competitors will.
In any return-to-office scenario, the most dangerous mistake a leader can make is failing to explain the reasoning behind the decision. Without clear communication, employees will inevitably jump to their own conclusions—often assuming favoritism, bias, or worse, incompetence. When trust erodes, even your most loyal employees will start to question whether they belong in your organization.
Transparency is not just a nicety; it’s essential for survival. Leaders must articulate exactly why some employees will remain remote and others will return full-time to the office. It should be crystal clear that the decision is based on role-specific needs, performance data, and the operational requirements of the company—not on arbitrary preferences or outdated notions of "face time."
Failing to communicate this clearly will send a damaging message: that leadership is out of touch, relying on gut feelings rather than real performance data. Employees will see this as a betrayal of the trust that was built during remote work, and top talent will begin plotting their exit.
Unclear expectations are the fastest route to chaos and resentment. If employees don’t know what’s expected of them—whether they are working in the office or remotely—they will feel lost, frustrated, and increasingly disconnected. Ambiguity breeds failure. And the consequences of unclear expectations will show up in poor performance, plummeting morale, and ultimately, a decline in the overall effectiveness of the organization.
Leaders must set concrete expectations for both remote and in-office employees. For those returning to the office, outline what in-person work will look like: hours, responsibilities, and collaboration expectations. Equally, for remote employees, the message must be clear: communication, availability, and deliverables must meet the highest standards to maintain the privilege of working from home.
Without these clear boundaries, the organization will devolve into a fractured, uncoordinated mess—leading to a decrease in productivity and morale that could take years to recover from.
If you think that announcing the return-to-office decision is the end of the story, you’re dead wrong. A failure to create open channels for feedback and dialogue after the decision will result in simmering resentment and, ultimately, a revolt against leadership.
Employees need to feel heard, especially when decisions affect their day-to-day lives in such a significant way. Leaders must establish formal channels for feedback, whether it’s through town halls, one-on-one meetings, or anonymous surveys. By ignoring this, you’re telling your employees that their opinions don’t matter, and that’s a recipe for disaster.
Leaders who allow frustration to build unchecked will face an exodus of talent. Employees won’t just become disengaged—they will actively seek opportunities where they feel valued and heard. Without a feedback loop, you’ll be blind to the growing unrest until it’s too late to fix.
Finally, leaders must reaffirm their commitment to all employees, regardless of whether they are working remotely or in the office. It’s all too easy to inadvertently create a divide between the two groups, where in-office employees feel superior and remote workers feel marginalized or the in-office employees are viewed as underperformers who need supervision to do their jobs.
A failure to maintain this unity will fracture your organization. It will breed resentment and create silos within the company. If the message becomes that one group is more important or more trusted than the other, you will lose the cohesive culture that enables teams to perform at their best.
Leaders must reiterate that both groups are vital to the success of the organization. This is not about choosing favorites—it’s about assigning the right work environments to optimize individual and organizational performance.
Leaders can’t afford to stumble when communicating a hybrid return-to-office strategy. Failure to explain the decision clearly, ignoring employee concerns, clinging to rigid policies, and creating unclear expectations will have far-reaching consequences. Talent will flee, morale will tank, and your business will struggle to recover.
The right approach is one rooted in transparency, empathy, and adaptability. Communicate clearly, set expectations, stay flexible, and, most importantly, listen. This is not just about getting people back into seats—it’s about navigating the future of work and ensuring your organization thrives in an era that demands both accountability and flexibility. Get it wrong, and you’ll be left behind. Get it right, and you’ll set the stage for a thriving, engaged workforce capable of navigating any challenge.
(07) 2114 9072
Drawn from lessons learned in the military, and in business, we make leadership principles tangible and relatable through real-world examples, personal anecdotes, and case studies.
© Copyright 2023 The Eighth Mile Consulting | Privacy